Trump’s reciprocal trade tariffs set to reshape global automotive supply chains and disrupt industry investment
The US aims to impose reciprocal tariffs around the world, triggering potential trade wars that could impact automotive logistics networks and dampen investment.

Trump tariffs: A timeline of impacts on automotive logistics
-
How Trump’s presidency is reshaping automotive logistics: A timeline of tariffs, trade disputes, and EV policy shifts
-
What day one under the Trump administration signals for the North American automotive supply chain
-
How Trump’s Panama Canal threat could reshape the automotive supply chain
-
North American supply chain under Trump: How the IRA pause affects the EV supply chain
-
Trump’s tariff pose on imports from Canada and Mexico tests resiliency of supply chain planners
-
China retaliates against Trump’s auto tariffs with 10% duty on US vehicles and WTO complaint
-
US-Panama Canal tensions escalate as US threatens action, raising fears of disruption for automotive logistics
-
Trump’s reciprocal trade tariffs set to reshape global automotive supply chains and disrupt industry investment
-
Donald Trump is imposing 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium from Canada and Mexico, and could include auto parts
-
Ukraine agrees to preliminary agreement to provide US with 50% of critical mineral revenue
-
Exemptions will apply to carmakers in line with USMCA, following talks with GM, Ford, Stellantis
-
US to impose global tariffs of 25% on steel and aluminium imports; European Commission announces retaliatory levies
-
Audi and BMW call for tariff-free trade in North America as Trump tariffs take their toll
-
The race before the border closes, as auto logistics braces for a 25% tariff reckoning
-
March 26 set the wheels in motion, here’s what’s coming before tariff D-Day on April 2
-
Trump’s “Liberation Day” automotive import tariffs disrupt global production, logistics and investment strategies
-
Impact of the new US trade policy includes the potential cumulative effects of ‘tariff stacking’
-
Stellantis is pausing production at plants in Canada and Mexico and laying off 900 staff in the US
-
JLR restarts vehicle shipments to the US following a pause due Trump tariffs on car and parts imports
-
VW Group one of a number of carmakers revising exports of vehicles from Mexico to US
-
European Union imposes retaliatory tariffs on $20bn of US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium duties
-
How Trump’s changing tariffs are disrupting automotive supply chains across China, Mexico, Canada and the EU
-
US automotive import tariffs hit prices and aggravate consumer uncertainty, says National Automobile Dealers Association
-
Trump’s 25% vehicle import tariffs could cost US carmakers $108bn and cut output by 17.7m vehicles
-
US-China tariff escalation disrupts rare earth exports and puts pressure on automotive supply chains
-
Opinion: Tariff shockwaves, investment freezes and cost pressure reshape global automotive logistics in 2025
-
US automotive part tariffs come into effect as Ford forecasts $1.5bn hit and suspends financial guidance
-
US-UK auto trade deal lowers vehicle import tariffs to 10% but caps UK exports at 100,000 vehicles
-
Potential US tariff cuts reshape global vehicle trade talks with EU, UK, China and more
-
Despite minor setbacks, the Chinese automotive industry may come out as a winner in the tariff war
-
Court of Appeals allows tariffs to continue after US court rules Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariffs illegal
US president Donald Trump has signed a Presidential Memorandum ordering a plan to be made for global reciprocal trade agreements and tariffs.
A White House statement said the reciprocal tariffs make it clear that the US “will no longer tolerate being ripped off”, adding: “The US has one of the most open economies in the world, yet our trading partners keep their markets closed to US exports, and reciprocal trade will finally correct that imbalance.” An example in the White House’s Fact Sheet said: “The EU imposes a 10% tariff on imported cars. Yet the US only imposes a 2.5% tariff.”
The US administration will look at nonreciprocal trade deals and taxes or tariffs imposed on the US, including differences in value-added tax (VAT), which Trump sees as an unfair trade barrier and indirect tariff. Administration staff will be asked to report back for a plan within 180 days.
How the tariffs could impact European and global automotive logistics
The task to discover how goods are taxed and where there are government subsidies will be monumental, especially for the automotive industry.

For example, the European Union (EU) has a 10% tariff on imported vehicles, and between 3-4.5% for most imports of automotive parts, while the US tariff on vehicle imports is 2.5% (25% on light-duty trucks). On top of this, VAT rates vary across countries, with most near 20% and some taxed even higher. While the US has no federal VAT system, different states have different sale tax rates ranging from 0-10%.
The US previously set tariffs through the World Trade Organization (WTO), but Trump’s announcement marks a departure from this norm, and instead sets the precedent that the US can determine its own trade agreements and higher tariffs.
It is likely to trigger a host of global trade negotiations, which could cause chaos among the automotive supply chain and hurt investment and long-term planning in automotive logistics.
Trump also called for a 25% tax to be imposed on all imports of steel and aluminium into the US – more than half of which come from Canada. In combination with the US’ tariffs on Canada and Mexico (currently on hold until March) and China, the US president’s decisions could reshape the flows and networks of the global automotive supply chain quickly and massively.
It will also likely increase costs for OEMs, at a time when they are already struggling with overheads and cutting costs where they can. Carmakers including Ford and GM have both warned that the steel and aluminium tariffs would add around $1 billion to each OEM’s costs.
Reciprocal and counter-tariffs could unravel global trade flows
Trade relations are already changing. In response to the reciprocal tariffs announcement, the European Commission has pledged to respond “firmly and immediately”, calling the tariffs “a step in the wrong direction”.

The Commission added: “For decades, the EU has worked with trading partners like the US to reduce tariffs and other trade barriers worldwide, reinforcing this openness through binding commitments in the rules-based trading system – commitments that the US is now undermining.”
Daniel Harrison, in-house automotive analyst at Automotive Logistics, said the move would reverse the success story of decades of globalisation and relatively tariff-free trade, creating chaos and uncertainty, and increasing retaliatory measures, trade barriers and the cost of doing business. The result will be a reduction in investment, raised prices for consumers, and slowed economic growth.
“Despite the overwhelmingly negative response to Trump’s tariff threats, he does have a point about reciprocal tariffs, but the point is that for everyone’s benefit those tariffs should be as low as possible to achieve free-trade – not to increase tariffs, so the EU considering lowering its tariff rate across the board from 10% closer to the US level is actually a step in the right direction,” Harrison said.
He added: “However, President’s Trump false belief that VAT functions like a tariff is fundamentally incorrect. He has deliberately conflated VAT and trade tariffs. VAT is usually paid on all (non essential) products sold, whether it is produced domestically or imported, and so VAT does not function like a tariff or a protectionist trade barrier that discriminates against imported goods.”
China has retaliated against Trump’s tariffs with a 10% duty on US vehicles and has also lodged a complaint with the World Trade Organization (WTO).
Likewise, the Mexican and Canadian governments have promised they will retaliate against any tariffs imposed on them. Claudia Ávila Connelly, international trade, nearshoring & economic development expert previously told Automotive Logistics that a trade war “would be terrible not only for the North American region but also for the world”. She added that we could enter into a new era of protectionism which would be “very dangerous for the world”.