BMW's product sustainability chief reveals the role supply chain played in reducing the new X5's lifecycle emissions by around 40%
With BMW unveiling the new X5 at its 'House of X' event in South Carolina, Nils Hesse, vice president of product sustainability at BMW Group, explained how the OEM managed to cut the vehicles lifecycle emissions by around 40%. Supply chain, he said, is the main contributor to CO2 reduction in electric vehicles.
BMW unveiled its 'Home of X' sculpture at BMW Zentrum as "a lasting symbol of BMW's commitment to South Carolina and the US"BMW Group
In the product development
process, BMW has claimed that the supply chain CO₂e emissions of the new fifth generation BMW X5 were reduced by around 40%; the reduction being based on a comparison with industry averages from an
internationally recognised life cycle assessment (LCA) database. This is a headline figure, no doubt – and headline figures tend to flatten the work
behind them.
In
an exclusive interview with Automotive Logistics' sister publication Automotive Manufacturing Solutions during the unveiling of the new model in Spartanburg in South Carolina, Nils Hesse, vice president of product
sustainability at BMW Group, was willing to reverse this flattening, expanding
out to precisely where that 40% came from and, more revealingly – from where it
did not.
Batteries first, aluminum
and steel close behind
Advertisement
Nils Hesse, Vice President of Product Sustainability at BMW Group on the carmaker's sustainability strategyAMS
Asked which of the four lifecycle stages
drove the largest single gain, Hesse did not equivocate. "In an electric vehicle, the supply chain is
the main contributor to CO2 reduction. The measures with the highest
impact are battery cells. Reducing the CO2 footprint of the cells
was the biggest single lever, followed by aluminum and steel."
That ordering
matters, because it confirms what much of the industry already suspects but
rarely hears confirmed on the record by a manufacturer's own sustainability
lead. Battery cells remain the single largest contributor available to an
automaker trying to decarbonise the supply chain of an electric vehicle – ahead
of body structure, ahead of production energy, ahead of everything else in an
OEM's bill of materials.
It
also explains why BMW has invested so heavily in the chemistry and sourcing of
its Gen6 cylindrical cells, now used in production of the BMW iX5's high
voltage battery, which, the carmaker says, have cut CO2e emissions by around
28% per watt hour compared with the Gen5 prismatic cells fitted to the BMW iX.
The all-new BMW X5 SUV at BMW Group Plant Spartanburg ahead of the 'Home of X' eventBMW Group
Hesse was equally direct about where the harder work still sits. "The most challenging stage remains across the supply chain," he explained. "In an electric vehicle, the use phase is already largely electrified, shifting the main CO2 reduction potential into the supply chain itself. That is why renewable energy is used in the production of anode and cathode materials, as well as in cell manufacturing."
Hesse added: "Battery cells remain the most important component in that chain,
but increasing the share of secondary materials is still difficult because
recycled battery-grade materials are not yet available at sufficient
scale."
It is a candid admission. And the constraint is not
one of appetite or engineering capability, but simply the physical supply of
recycled battery grade material in the market today.
BMW Group — New BMW X5
Where the carbon comes out: materials and supply chain
Decarbonisation, secondary materials and local sourcing account for the bulk of the emissions reduction achieved during development of the new X5. Tap any figure for detail.
Supply chain→Production→Use phase→Recycling
~40%
CO₂e reduction, product development
Achieved during the X5's product development process, driven primarily by decarbonisation across the supply chain, and benchmarked against an internationally recognised LCA industry-average database.
50%
of flat steel is EAF steel
Detail
Electric arc furnace steel with a high secondary-material content, produced using renewable energy through long-standing collaboration with local North American suppliers.
35%
recycled aluminum in the doors
Detail
Closed-loop material recovered from BMW Plant Spartanburg's own press shop, keeping the recycling loop local to the production site.
100%
recycled PET in headliner yarn
Detail
The base material used for the headliner fabric's yarn is made entirely from recycled PET.
⅓
of iX5 60 xDrive is secondary material
Detail
Roughly one third of the total vehicle by weight, equivalent to 940kg, including aluminum suspension parts, rims and wheel carriers, and swivel bearings.
28%
lower Gen6 battery CO₂e per Wh
Detail
Versus the Gen5 cell used in the BMW iX. Renewable energy, secondary cobalt, lithium and nickel content, and product and process innovations together drive the reduction.
100%
renewable energy in secondary alloy production
Detail
Aluminum suspension parts, including rims, wheel carriers and swivel bearings, are manufactured using renewable energy for both electrolysis and production.
Figures are preliminary forecast values for the X5 40d xDrive and iX5 60 xDrive, to be confirmed in the Vehicle Footprint (VFP) ahead of Start of Production. CO₂e reduction benchmarked against an internationally recognised LCA industry-average database. Source: BMW Group Corporate Communications, media information, 24 June 2026, and exclusive AMS interview with Nils Hesse, VP Product Sustainability, BMW Group.
A hundred thousand suppliers deep
BMW contractually requires every battery cell supplier
it works with to run on 100% renewable energy. It is the kind of commitment
that reads cleanly on a sustainability slide, and considerably less so once you
ask how it is actually enforced beyond the first link in the chain. Hesse's
answer was unusually candid about the limits of contractual leverage in a
modern automotive production and supply chain.
High-voltage battery assembly at BMW Group Plant Woodruff supplies finished battery packs to Spartanburg from just 15 miles awayBMW Group
"Our direct contractual
relationship is with the tier-one supplier, and this is where we anchor
requirements such as the use of renewable energy for our production needs," he said. "At
the same time, these requirements are designed to cascade beyond tier one: the
tier-one supplier is expected to pass equivalent obligations, including on
energy use and other decarbonisation measures, on to its own suppliers further
down the value chain."
Advertisement
The scale of
what that cascading obligation actually involves is where the conversation
became genuinely striking, and where the realities of sustainability 'scopes'
begin to take on more solid forms. "The challenge is that once you follow
the whole chain down, the BMW Group overall has more than 100,000 direct and indirect
suppliers," he explained. "Proving or evidencing compliance at
the deepest layers of that chain is the challenge. And this, of course, feeds
into manufacturing."
A
hundred thousand suppliers is not a figure that lends itself to spot audits or
site visits. It is a figure that only really works through contractual
cascading, trust and increasingly sophisticated traceability tooling; none of
which fully closes the verification gap Hesse is describing. For those in the
know – or those who want to know, Catena‑X, co-initiated by BMW Group and
industry partners, is one example of how the automotive sector is addressing
this challenge.
BMW Group — New BMW X5
From plant floor to payback: production and use phase
Renewable-powered manufacturing at Plant Spartanburg and efficiency gains in use bring the new X5's carbon advantage forward. Tap either section to expand it.
Production at Plant Spartanburg
100%
of external power at Plant Spartanburg comes from renewable sources
-66%
energy consumption per vehicle produced, 2006–2025
-88%
landfill waste volume over the same period
WoodruffThe newly built high-voltage battery assembly plant, connected to the main Spartanburg site, runs entirely without fossil fuels in normal operation.
ScalePlant Spartanburg is the BMW Group's largest production site, applying its holistic sustainability approach across all X5 drivetrain variants.
Use phase & transparency
CO₂e breakeven vs a comparable combustion model
~1–2 yrs
0 years10 years
The BMW iX5 60 xDrive reaches a CO₂e advantage after roughly one to two years of use, depending on drivetrain variant, annual mileage and charging electricity source.
EfficiencyThe EfficientDynamics package, in use across all BMW drive technologies since 2007, optimises aerodynamics, lightweight construction, tyres and energy management.
iX5 driveThe fully electric iX5 uses the in-house "Heart of Joy" driving stack, recovering energy through recuperation across significantly more driving situations, down to a standstill.
TÜVA Product Carbon Footprint for the X5, validated by TÜV Rhineland, will be published alongside the series launch, with the full calculation methodology made publicly available.
Breakeven figure depends on drivetrain variant, annual mileage and the source of charging electricity. Energy and waste figures cover BMW Group Plant Spartanburg, 2006–2025. Source: BMW Group Corporate Communications, media information, 24 June 2026.
What shredding does,
and does not change
The move from
Gen5 prismatic to Gen6 cylindrical cells has been framed publicly as a
chemistry and manufacturing story, but Hesse was clear that the 28% reduction
traces back to two specific levers rather than the format change itself. "There are two main levers for reducing CO2
in this area," he said. "First, renewable energy – which, of course,
has a very high impact. The second, though, is the use of secondary raw
materials for nickel, lithium and cobalt, and thirdly, product and process
innovations."
That distinction carries through to end-of-life
recycling too, where BMW's own account resists the idea that switching cell
formats meaningfully changes recycling economics. "On recycling, we are
working with partners to find ways of
recycling cells without full shredding – or of shredding and then separating
the materials afterwards.
"The format itself," he noted, "doesn't really matter at that
point – and that stands whether it's a phone battery, a cylindrical cell or a
prismatic cell – the end process is essentially the same once shredded. Battery
size is relevant to the type of shredder required, but the outcome is the same
regardless of even format."
Cells arrive from Woodruff 15 miles up the road, to be assembled into battery packs at Spartanburg, to full manufacture of the new X5 models
This
is a subtle but important point for suppliers and recyclers designing capacity
around next generation cell formats. The hardware footprint of a shredding line
may need to flex for high-voltage battery, battery modules or cells, but the
underlying separation chemistry – and the CO2e case for doing it at all – does
not change with format.
Verification, three
ways
Advertisement
Scope 3
emissions are traditionally where sustainability claims come apart under
scrutiny, being the hardest tier of any supply chain to measure and the easiest
to overstate. Asked how far down its supply chain BMW currently has genuine
data-level visibility on embodied carbon beyond tier one, Hesse pointed to
three layers of verification the company relies on. These appear to include
ongoing internal checking, external reporting and verification of the vehicle's
product carbon footprint, and confirmation through BMW's annual report – which is
checked by an independent external auditor.
It
is a structure that leans on established financial style audit discipline to
backstop a carbon claim, an approach that mirrors the TÜV Rhineland validated
Product Carbon Footprint BMW intends to publish alongside the BMW X5's series
launch, complete with the underlying calculation methodology made publicly
available. From supply chain to production, sustainability is now a fully
operational working system for the OEM.
Whether that three-tier structure
genuinely closes the visibility gap Hesse described earlier, across a supply
chain that extends to more than 100,000 direct and indirect suppliers across BMW Group, is a question the industry will keep asking long
after the BMW X5 badge is on the road.
What BMW has offered with this
generation of the model is an unusually granular account of where its
production decarbonisation actually comes from: battery cells first, steel and
aluminum close behind, and a supply chain whose deepest layers remain, by the
carmaker's own admission, difficult to prove. But difficult, increasingly, does
not mean impossible.