Reciprocal ruling
Court of Appeals allows tariffs to continue after US court rules Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariffs illegal
A US federal court has ruled that US president Donald Trump did not have the authority to impose ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on individual countries, blocking his planned tariffs. But just 24 hours later, the administration’s appeal of the decision has allowed the tariffs to continue until further notice.

Trump tariffs: A timeline of impacts on automotive logistics
-
How Trump’s presidency is reshaping automotive logistics: A timeline of tariffs, trade disputes, and EV policy shifts
-
What day one under the Trump administration signals for the North American automotive supply chain
-
How Trump’s Panama Canal threat could reshape the automotive supply chain
-
North American supply chain under Trump: How the IRA pause affects the EV supply chain
-
Trump’s tariff pose on imports from Canada and Mexico tests resiliency of supply chain planners
-
China retaliates against Trump’s auto tariffs with 10% duty on US vehicles and WTO complaint
-
US-Panama Canal tensions escalate as US threatens action, raising fears of disruption for automotive logistics
-
Trump’s reciprocal trade tariffs set to reshape global automotive supply chains and disrupt industry investment
-
Donald Trump is imposing 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium from Canada and Mexico, and could include auto parts
-
Ukraine agrees to preliminary agreement to provide US with 50% of critical mineral revenue
-
Exemptions will apply to carmakers in line with USMCA, following talks with GM, Ford, Stellantis
-
US to impose global tariffs of 25% on steel and aluminium imports; European Commission announces retaliatory levies
-
Audi and BMW call for tariff-free trade in North America as Trump tariffs take their toll
-
The race before the border closes, as auto logistics braces for a 25% tariff reckoning
-
March 26 set the wheels in motion, here’s what’s coming before tariff D-Day on April 2
-
Trump’s “Liberation Day” automotive import tariffs disrupt global production, logistics and investment strategies
-
Impact of the new US trade policy includes the potential cumulative effects of ‘tariff stacking’
-
Stellantis is pausing production at plants in Canada and Mexico and laying off 900 staff in the US
-
JLR restarts vehicle shipments to the US following a pause due Trump tariffs on car and parts imports
-
VW Group one of a number of carmakers revising exports of vehicles from Mexico to US
-
European Union imposes retaliatory tariffs on $20bn of US goods in response to Trump’s steel and aluminium duties
-
How Trump’s changing tariffs are disrupting automotive supply chains across China, Mexico, Canada and the EU
-
US automotive import tariffs hit prices and aggravate consumer uncertainty, says National Automobile Dealers Association
-
Trump’s 25% vehicle import tariffs could cost US carmakers $108bn and cut output by 17.7m vehicles
-
US-China tariff escalation disrupts rare earth exports and puts pressure on automotive supply chains
-
Opinion: Tariff shockwaves, investment freezes and cost pressure reshape global automotive logistics in 2025
-
US automotive part tariffs come into effect as Ford forecasts $1.5bn hit and suspends financial guidance
-
US-UK auto trade deal lowers vehicle import tariffs to 10% but caps UK exports at 100,000 vehicles
-
Potential US tariff cuts reshape global vehicle trade talks with EU, UK, China and more
-
Despite minor setbacks, the Chinese automotive industry may come out as a winner in the tariff war
-
Court of Appeals allows tariffs to continue after US court rules Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariffs illegal
Updated 30 May
Just a day after the Court of International Trade ruled that Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariffs were illegally enforced, the decision has been paused by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which granted a temporary stay on the tariffs until further notice. The US can continue to collect tariffs until the pause is lifted.
We will update this story as more information becomes available
The Court of International Trade has ruled that US president Donald Trump did not have the authority to impose ‘reciprocal’ tariffs on individual countries, and has blocked his planned tariffs on the likes of Canada, Mexico and China.
The court invalidated all the tariffs the US has imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), which includes the tariffs on individual countries that Trump announced on ‘Liberation Day’, and the replacement global tariff of 10%. However, they change the tariffs on the automotive industry, including 25% tariffs on vehicle imports, 25% tariffs on car part imports, and 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium imports to the US.
The court ruled that the IEEPA law did not give Trump the unilateral power to enforce the ‘reciprocal tariffs’ based on trade deficits, stating: “The court does not pass upon the wisdom or likely effectiveness of the president’s use of tariffs as leverage. That use is impermissible, not because it is unwise or ineffective, but because the law does not allow it.”
Trump’s administration has been given 10 days to halt the tariffs – most of which had been paused already and replaced with a global 10% tariff put in place. But the administration responded almost instantly by filing a notice of appeal. It’s unclear how long the appeals process could take, with the potential of going to the Supreme Court. The pause that Trump had put on the tariffs at the beginning of April was set to last 90 days, meaning they would be expected to begin at the start of July unless trade negotiations were successful before then.
Yet again, the tariff decision throws even more uncertainty on the automotive industry. If it goes all the way to the Supreme Court, it could take months until a decision is made, leaving OEMs and suppliers at a loss on optimal trade routes and whether or not to reorganise flows. Many carmakers have been adopting the “wait and see” approach with the reciprocal tariffs so far, while others have paused production and shipments.